<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integrated Marketing &amp; Communications, Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html</link>
	<description>Marketing and Communications for the Customer-Centric Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/comment-page-1#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=1269#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>The question of ROI in Social Media seems to be a hot one lately and I think it needs to be addressed as more and more companies are dedicating human and out of pocket resources to Social Media. I think that the definition of ROI has changed, and needs to evolve. ROI is no longer the traditional Direct Response ROI of account times revenue per customer acquired or retained. ROI or Payback can be calculated, or perhaps demonstrated is a better word, in three ways.

Specific Customer Behaviors - As Social Media evolves, the measurable behaviors will grow but for now there are tweets, re-tweets, Fans, Followers etc. I think that once a benchmark is established versus the competition, or versus your own baseline, a trend can be established and results demonstrated to management. This will help rationalize resource allocation.

Sales/Revenue - It seems that the revenue side is less distinct and harder to measure especially for larger companies. For smaller to small/medium companies, where there may not been much &quot;marketing&quot;, the company can probably attribute an increase in sales to these efforts. Generally, in larger companies, for sales related activities, Social Media is part of an integrated strategy. Therefore, it is harder to attribute specific results solely to Social Media, and the project or effort needs to be paid out on a total basis. The &#039;whole is greater than the sum of its parts&quot;

Expense Reduction - The expense reduction side seems somewhat easier to quantify. For example, if the company counts the # of customers it helps or services, this can be quantified based on the cost of answering an incoming e-mail or call. A customer&#039;s retention value may be able to be quantified if the customer had a serious issue, then the lifetime customer value can be used. This seems straight forward and can help rationalize the human expense associated with Social Media.

In short, I believe that Social Media is part of the marketing mix and can be quantified through innovative and focused thinking. This quantification will help Management, as well as Team Members, help to understand its value to growing and retaining business, and thus justify the expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of ROI in Social Media seems to be a hot one lately and I think it needs to be addressed as more and more companies are dedicating human and out of pocket resources to Social Media. I think that the definition of ROI has changed, and needs to evolve. ROI is no longer the traditional Direct Response ROI of account times revenue per customer acquired or retained. ROI or Payback can be calculated, or perhaps demonstrated is a better word, in three ways.</p>
<p>Specific Customer Behaviors &#8211; As Social Media evolves, the measurable behaviors will grow but for now there are tweets, re-tweets, Fans, Followers etc. I think that once a benchmark is established versus the competition, or versus your own baseline, a trend can be established and results demonstrated to management. This will help rationalize resource allocation.</p>
<p>Sales/Revenue &#8211; It seems that the revenue side is less distinct and harder to measure especially for larger companies. For smaller to small/medium companies, where there may not been much &#8220;marketing&#8221;, the company can probably attribute an increase in sales to these efforts. Generally, in larger companies, for sales related activities, Social Media is part of an integrated strategy. Therefore, it is harder to attribute specific results solely to Social Media, and the project or effort needs to be paid out on a total basis. The &#8216;whole is greater than the sum of its parts&#8221;</p>
<p>Expense Reduction &#8211; The expense reduction side seems somewhat easier to quantify. For example, if the company counts the # of customers it helps or services, this can be quantified based on the cost of answering an incoming e-mail or call. A customer&#8217;s retention value may be able to be quantified if the customer had a serious issue, then the lifetime customer value can be used. This seems straight forward and can help rationalize the human expense associated with Social Media.</p>
<p>In short, I believe that Social Media is part of the marketing mix and can be quantified through innovative and focused thinking. This quantification will help Management, as well as Team Members, help to understand its value to growing and retaining business, and thus justify the expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan O'Malley</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/comment-page-1#comment-2953</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan O'Malley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=1269#comment-2953</guid>
		<description>So happy to discover a blog dedicated to the wonderful world of IMC. Our IMC class at Northwestern (including Daniel above) was referred to your blog by Rob Mark. Be sure to give him due props for recruiting us. 

Can&#039;t wait to see what more you have to say on the IMC front!
.-= Megan O&#039;Malley&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vitaminimc.com/2010/02/vitamin-imc-turns-one-year-old.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vitamin IMC turns one year old!&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So happy to discover a blog dedicated to the wonderful world of IMC. Our IMC class at Northwestern (including Daniel above) was referred to your blog by Rob Mark. Be sure to give him due props for recruiting us. </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see what more you have to say on the IMC front!<br />
.-= Megan O&#8217;Malley&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.vitaminimc.com/2010/02/vitamin-imc-turns-one-year-old.html" rel="nofollow">Vitamin IMC turns one year old!</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Harte</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/comment-page-1#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Harte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=1269#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>David, thank you...that means a lot to me. And yes! I am looking forward to talking about integration with you. 

Giles, absolutely...also, I’ve been giving a lot of thought to ‘sales-oriented’ companies versus ‘market-oriented’ companies, which is also another big factor. As for the complexity of management, if the C-Suite doesn’t embrace the concept of integration, it will be tough to send it downstream to other line managers.

David, thanks buddy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, thank you&#8230;that means a lot to me. And yes! I am looking forward to talking about integration with you. </p>
<p>Giles, absolutely&#8230;also, I’ve been giving a lot of thought to ‘sales-oriented’ companies versus ‘market-oriented’ companies, which is also another big factor. As for the complexity of management, if the C-Suite doesn’t embrace the concept of integration, it will be tough to send it downstream to other line managers.</p>
<p>David, thanks buddy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/comment-page-1#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=1269#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>Yay!! Welcome back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay!! Welcome back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles (Webconomist)</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2010/01/integrated-marketing-communications-redux.html/comment-page-1#comment-2902</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles (Webconomist)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=1269#comment-2902</guid>
		<description>Quite agree with Rob Mark&#039;s comment on turf-protecting; we do and support what we know best in our frames of reference based on our experiences.

Perhaps part of the challenge too is the complexity of managing so many channels and having the resources to determine the best ones then manage them?

Great to see you back Beth and glad you&#039;re focusing on &quot;integration&quot; - truly it&#039;s key.
.-= Giles (Webconomist)&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediabadger.com/2010/01/social-media-use-in-atlantic-canada-2010-report/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Media Use in Atlantic Canada: 2010 Report&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite agree with Rob Mark&#8217;s comment on turf-protecting; we do and support what we know best in our frames of reference based on our experiences.</p>
<p>Perhaps part of the challenge too is the complexity of managing so many channels and having the resources to determine the best ones then manage them?</p>
<p>Great to see you back Beth and glad you&#8217;re focusing on &#8220;integration&#8221; &#8211; truly it&#8217;s key.<br />
.-= Giles (Webconomist)&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.mediabadger.com/2010/01/social-media-use-in-atlantic-canada-2010-report/" rel="nofollow">Social Media Use in Atlantic Canada: 2010 Report</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

