<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR 2.0: #pr20chat May 20, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html</link>
	<description>Marketing and Communications for the Customer-Centric Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:52:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Technology is not the Key in Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/comment-page-1#comment-1987</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Technology is not the Key in Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=936#comment-1987</guid>
		<description>[...] a Twitter discussion tonight (#PR20chat - hat tip to Beth Harte for initiating a good chat), there was some discussion around [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a Twitter discussion tonight (#PR20chat &#8211; hat tip to Beth Harte for initiating a good chat), there was some discussion around [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s PR 2.0 anyway? &#171; Jame Ervin&#8217;s @ Work</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/comment-page-1#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s PR 2.0 anyway? &#171; Jame Ervin&#8217;s @ Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=936#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>[...] training with @jessica_misspr and @shonalnarayan after recapping some of the commentary on the PR 2.0 chat,  so I thought it was a good time to get some feedback on a presentation I&#8217;ve been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] training with @jessica_misspr and @shonalnarayan after recapping some of the commentary on the PR 2.0 chat,  so I thought it was a good time to get some feedback on a presentation I&#8217;ve been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Harte</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/comment-page-1#comment-1934</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Harte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=936#comment-1934</guid>
		<description>@MackCollier, thanks for the feedback and making the time to join in Mack, I appreciate it. And you know I feel the same about your #blogchat (I just need to join in more often!). I think the lack of threaded conversations makes it a little difficult, but I am okay with that because sometimes it’s the side conversations that make these chats more interesting. 

@ArtAiello, thanks for the honest critique! As for being hijacked, if you see any tweets with a #blogchat, #pr20chat, #journchat, @smallbizchat, etc. and don’t want to be involved in the whole chat, you might want to just ignore them. If they are something you’re interested in, consider joining the chat. If not, respond to the person but leave off the hashtag, so that your comment doesn’t become part of the record. 

As for the recap, it was just that because some folks asked for it in advance because they knew they’d miss that chat. I did it for them… Would I do it again, probably not. Will I recap each chat and its points, honestly, probably not. I am not doing the chats to market myself…I am doing them because I think people want to discuss where PR is heading. So, you can look forward to an hour chat and that’s about it.

Having been involved in many chats (Mack mentioned the Plurkshops up above in his comment), I know they can be entertaining for a few weeks and then die off or they can morph into something else. They key is to not control or contain the conversation…

@StuartFoster, @JenWilbur, thanks for the feedback! Hope to see you this week. 

@MLDina, @David there’s always another week…looking forward to your insights if you join the chat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MackCollier, thanks for the feedback and making the time to join in Mack, I appreciate it. And you know I feel the same about your #blogchat (I just need to join in more often!). I think the lack of threaded conversations makes it a little difficult, but I am okay with that because sometimes it’s the side conversations that make these chats more interesting. </p>
<p>@ArtAiello, thanks for the honest critique! As for being hijacked, if you see any tweets with a #blogchat, #pr20chat, #journchat, @smallbizchat, etc. and don’t want to be involved in the whole chat, you might want to just ignore them. If they are something you’re interested in, consider joining the chat. If not, respond to the person but leave off the hashtag, so that your comment doesn’t become part of the record. </p>
<p>As for the recap, it was just that because some folks asked for it in advance because they knew they’d miss that chat. I did it for them… Would I do it again, probably not. Will I recap each chat and its points, honestly, probably not. I am not doing the chats to market myself…I am doing them because I think people want to discuss where PR is heading. So, you can look forward to an hour chat and that’s about it.</p>
<p>Having been involved in many chats (Mack mentioned the Plurkshops up above in his comment), I know they can be entertaining for a few weeks and then die off or they can morph into something else. They key is to not control or contain the conversation…</p>
<p>@StuartFoster, @JenWilbur, thanks for the feedback! Hope to see you this week. </p>
<p>@MLDina, @David there’s always another week…looking forward to your insights if you join the chat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/comment-page-1#comment-1924</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 01:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=936#comment-1924</guid>
		<description>Looks good. I&#039;ll make a point of hanging around in #pr20chat this week!
Thanks.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;David’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://totallyincorrect.com/?p=2277&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Blog of the Week - Discomfort Zone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good. I&#8217;ll make a point of hanging around in #pr20chat this week!<br />
Thanks.</p>
<p><abbr><em>David’s last blog post..<a href="http://totallyincorrect.com/?p=2277" rel="nofollow">Blog of the Week &#8211; Discomfort Zone</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLDina</title>
		<link>http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/2009/05/pr20chat-052009.html/comment-page-1#comment-1916</link>
		<dc:creator>MLDina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theharteofmarketing.com/?p=936#comment-1916</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed participating in this, I would&#039;ve loved to be involved. I&#039;ll keep an eye out for next time. It&#039;s great meeting new people in the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I missed participating in this, I would&#8217;ve loved to be involved. I&#8217;ll keep an eye out for next time. It&#8217;s great meeting new people in the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
